Automated Quantification of Cerebral Microbleeds in SWI: Association with Vascular Risk Factors, White Matter Hyperintensity Burden, and Cognitive Function

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Haller S,
   2. Vernooij MW,
   3. Kuijer JPA, et al

   . Cerebral microbleeds: imaging and clinical significance. Radiology 2018;287:11–28 doi:10.1148/radiol.2018170803 pmid:29558307

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Fazekas F,
   2. Kleinert R,
   3. Roob G, et al

   . Histopathologic analysis of foci of signal loss on gradient-echo T2*-weighted MR images in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: evidence of microangiopathy-related microbleeds. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:637–42 pmid:10319975

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Shams S,
   2. Martola J,
   3. Cavallin L, et al

   . SWI or T2*: which MRI sequence to use in the detection of cerebral microbleeds? The Karolinska Imaging Dementia Study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1089–95 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4248 pmid:25698623

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Sharrief A

   . Diagnosis and management of cerebral small vessel disease. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2023;29:501–18 doi:10.1212/CON.0000000000001232 pmid:37039407

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Balestrieri A,
   2. Lucatelli P,
   3. Suri HS, et al

   . Volume of white matter hyperintensities, and cerebral micro-bleeds. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2021;30:105905 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105905 pmid:34107418

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Zhao Y,
   2. Zhou Y,
   3. Zhou H, et al

   . Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, statin therapy, and cerebral microbleeds: the CIRCLE study. Neuroimage Clin 2023;39:103502 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103502 pmid:37643520

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Mitaki S,
   2. Nagai A,
   3. Oguro H, et al

   . Serum lipid fractions and cerebral microbleeds in a healthy Japanese population. Cerebrovasc Dis 2017;43:186–91 doi:10.1159/000456623 pmid:28208146

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Konishi M,
   2. Iso H,
   3. Komachi Y, et al

   . Associations of serum total cholesterol, different types of stroke, and stenosis distribution of cerebral arteries: the Akita Pathology Study. Stroke 1993;24:954–64 doi:10.1161/01.str.24.7.954 pmid:8322395

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Gottesman RF,
   2. Schneider AL,
   3. Zhou Y, et al

   . Association between midlife vascular risk factors and estimated brain amyloid deposition. JAMA 2017;317:1443–50 doi:10.1001/jama.2017.3090 pmid:28399252

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Poels MM,
    2. Ikram MA,
    3. van der Lugt A, et al

    . Cerebral microbleeds are associated with worse cognitive function: the Rotterdam Scan Study. Neurology 2012;78:326–33 doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182452928 pmid:22262748

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Poels MM,
    2. Vernooij MW,
    3. Ikram MA, et al

    . Prevalence and risk factors of cerebral microbleeds: an update of the Rotterdam Scan Study. Stroke 2010;41:S103–06 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.595181 pmid:20876479

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Liu S,
    2. Utriainen D,
    3. Chai C, et al

    . Cerebral microbleed detection using susceptibility weighted imaging and deep learning. Neuroimage 2019;198:271–82 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.046 pmid:31121296

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Cordonnier C,
    2. Potter GM,
    3. Jackson CA, et al

    . Improving interrater agreement about brain microbleeds. Stroke 2009;40:94–99 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.526996 pmid:19008468

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Wang R,
    2. Lei T,
    3. Cui R, et al

    . Medical image segmentation using deep learning: a survey. IET Image Processing 2022;16:1243–67 doi:10.1049/ipr2.12419

    CrossRef
15. 15.↵
    1. Isensee F,
    2. Jaeger PF,
    3. Kohl SA, et al

    . nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nat Methods 2021;18:203–11 doi:10.1038/s41592-020-01008-z pmid:33288961

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Eijgelaar RS,
    2. Visser M,
    3. Müller DM, et al

    . Robust deep learning–based segmentation of glioblastoma on routine clinical MRI scans using sparsified training. Radiol Artif Intell 2020;2:e190103 doi:10.1148/ryai.2020190103 pmid:33937837

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Mansour RF,
    2. Aljehane NO

    . An optimal segmentation with deep learning-based inception network model for intracranial hemorrhage diagnosis. Neural Comput Appl 2021;33:13831–43 doi:10.1007/s00521-021-06020-8

    CrossRef
18. 18.↵
    1. Koschmieder K,
    2. Paul MM,
    3. van den Heuvel TL, et al

    . Automated detection of cerebral microbleeds via segmentation in susceptibility-weighted images of patients with traumatic brain injury. Neuroimage Clin 2022;35:10302 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103027 pmid:35597029

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Li X,
    2. Morgan PS,
    3. Ashburner J, et al

    . The first step for neuroimaging data analysis: DICOM to NIfTI conversion. J Neurosci Methods 2016;264:47–56 doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.03.001 pmid:26945974

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Isensee F,
    2. Schell M,
    3. Pflueger I, et al

    . Automated brain extraction of multisequence MRI using artificial neural networks. Hum Brain Mapp 2019;40:4952–64 doi:10.1002/hbm.24750 pmid:31403237

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Tustison NJ,
    2. Avants BB,
    3. Cook PA, et al

    . N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2010;29:1310–20 doi:10.1109/TMI.2010.2046908 pmid:20378467

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Billot B,
    2. Greve DN,
    3. Puonti O, et al

    ; ADNI, SynthSeg: segmentation of brain MRI scans of any contrast and resolution without retraining. Med Image Anal 2023;86:102789 doi:10.1016/j.media.2023.102789 pmid:36857946

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Thada V,
    2. Jaglan V

    . Comparison of jaccard, dice, cosine similarity coefficient to find best fitness value for web retrieved documents using genetic algorithm. International Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology 2013;2(4):202–205
24. 24.↵
    1. Fan P,
    2. Shan W,
    3. Yang H, et al

    . Cerebral microbleed automatic detection system based on the “deep learning.” Front Med (Lausanne) 2022;9:807443 doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.807443 pmid:35402427

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Al-Masni MA,
    2. Kim W-R,
    3. Kim EY, et al

    . Automated detection of cerebral microbleeds in MR images: a two-stage deep learning approach. Neuroimage Clin 2020;28:102464 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102464 pmid:33395960

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Romero JR,
    2. Preis SR,
    3. Beiser A, et al

    . Risk factors, stroke prevention treatments, and prevalence of cerebral microbleeds in the Framingham Heart Study. Stroke 2014;45:1492–94 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.004130 pmid:24713533

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Gao Z,
    2. Wang W,
    3. Wang Z, et al

    . Cerebral microbleeds are associated with deep white matter hyperintensities, but only in hypertensive patients. PLoS One 2014;9:e91637 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0091637 pmid:24626222

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Zhao X,
    2. Yin L,
    3. Yu L, et al

    . Correlation study and clinical value analysis between cerebral microbleeds and white matter hyperintensity with high-field susceptibility-weighted imaging. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023;102:e35003 doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000035003 pmid:37682129

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Graff-Radford J,
    2. Arenaza-Urquijo EM,
    3. Knopman DS, et al

    . White matter hyperintensities: relationship to amyloid and tau burden. Brain 2019;142:2483–91 doi:10.1093/brain/awz162 pmid:31199475

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Lee S,
    2. Zimmerman ME,
    3. Narkhede A, et al

    ; Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network. White matter hyperintensities and the mediating role of cerebral amyloid angiopathy in dominantly-inherited Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS One 2018;13:e0195838 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0195838 pmid:29742105

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Holland CM,
    2. Smith EE,
    3. Csapo I, et al

    . Spatial distribution of white-matter hyperintensities in Alzheimer disease, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, and healthy aging. Stroke 2008;39:1127–33 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.497438 pmid:18292383

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    1. Zamboni G,
    2. Griffanti L,
    3. Jenkinson M, et al

    ; Oxford Vascular Study. White matter imaging correlates of early cognitive impairment detected by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment after transient ischemic attack and minor stroke. Stroke 2017;48:1539–47 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016044 pmid:28487328

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    1. Greenberg SM,
    2. Eng JA,
    3. Ning M, et al

    . Hemorrhage burden predicts recurrent intracerebral hemorrhage after lobar hemorrhage. Stroke 2004;35:1415–20 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000126807.69758.0e pmid:15073385

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. 34.↵
    1. Werring DJ,
    2. Gregoire SM,
    3. Cipolotti L

    . Cerebral microbleeds and vascular cognitive impairment. J Neurol Sci 2010;299:131–35 doi:10.1016/j.jns.2010.08.034 pmid:20850134

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Nakamori M,
    2. Hosomi N,
    3. Tachiyama K, et al

    . Lobar microbleeds are associated with cognitive impairment in patients with lacunar infarction. Sci Rep 2020;10:16410 doi:10.1038/s41598-020-73404-6 pmid:33009480

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Yu AC,
    2. Mohajer B,
    3. Eng J

    . External validation of deep learning algorithms for radiologic diagnosis: a systematic review. Radiol Artif Intell 2022;4:e210064 doi:10.1148/ryai.210064 pmid:35652114

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Gouw AA,
    2. Seewann A,
    3. van der Flier WM, et al

    . Heterogeneity of small vessel disease: a systematic review of MRI and histopathology correlations. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2011;82:126–35 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2009.204685 pmid:20935330

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    1. Yang Q,
    2. Wei X,
    3. Deng B, et al

    . Cerebral small vessel disease alters neurovascular unit regulation of microcirculation integrity involved in vascular cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Dis 2022;170:105750 doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2022.105750 pmid:35580816

    CrossRefPubMed