Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR is seeking candidates for the AJNR Podcast Editor. Read the position description.

OtherINTERVENTIONAL

Angiographic CT in Cerebrovascular Stenting

Götz Benndorf, Charles M. Strother, Benjamin Claus, Ramin Naeini, Hesham Morsi, Richard Klucznik and Michael E. Mawad
American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2005, 26 (7) 1813-1818;
Götz Benndorf
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles M. Strother
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin Claus
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ramin Naeini
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hesham Morsi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Klucznik
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael E. Mawad
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Summary: We evaluated the feasibility of angiographic CT (ACT) for visualizing metallic stents in three patients who underwent intracranial (n = 2) or extracranial (n = 1) stent placement to treat atherosclerotic lesions. ACT is a new technique that provides cross-sectional CT-like images based on rotational radiography performed with a rotating C-arm–mounted flat-panel detector. ACT allowed for the clear visualization of stents in both intracranial and extracranial arteries and was superior to conventional digital subtraction angiography and digital radiography in visualizing both the stent struts and their relationships to the arterial walls and aneurysmal lumen.

The use of intracranial stents has rapidly expanded over the past 5 years, particularly since the introduction of small, self-expandable stents developed specifically for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. The small size and tortuous anatomy of intracranial arteries require that stents used in the intracranial vasculature have a low profile, high flexibility, and excellent trackability. Providing these features limits the degree of radiopacity that can be incorporated into the stents, Therefore, intraprocedural and postprocedural visualization of the exact position of the stent and the degree of stent deployment by using conventional radiographic techniques is suboptimal. Full stent deployment and good apposition of the stent margins to the arterial wall are of major importance in limiting subacute stent thrombosis. We present our preliminary experience in imaging of intracranial stents by using angiographic CT (ACT) with a new flat-detector angiographic system.

Technique and Cases

In three patients referred for intracranial stent placement, ACT was performed immediately after stent deployment. All patients were under general anesthesia. Using a flat-detector biplane angiographic system (Axiom Artis dBA; Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, German), and with respiration suspended, we performed rotational radiography with new commercially available software (Dyna-CT). Parameters were as follows: 20 seconds, 0.4° increment, 512 matrix in projections, 220° total angle, 20°/second, approximately 15–30 frames/second, and 538 projections. Image postprocessing was performed to correct for scattered radiation, beam hardening, and ring artifacts on a workstation (Leonardo; Siemens Medical Solutions). Display of imaged stents was obtained by using multiplanar reconstructions (MPRs).

Case 1

A 66-year-old man was treated because of symptomatic 85% stenosis at the origin of the internal carotid artery (ICA). A long segment of irregular atherosclerotic plaque extended beyond the stenosis at the origin of the ICA. After a protective device (Accunet; Guidant Corporation, Menlo Park, CA) was placed in the distal cervical segment of the ICA, stent placement was done by using a 6–8 × 40-mm device (Acculink; Guidant Corporation). Because significant residual stenosis was present immediately after stenting, postdilation of the stent was performed by using a 6 × 30-mm balloon (Maverick, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA). This dilation resulted in less than 20% residual stenosis. ACT, three-dimensional (3D) digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and digital radiography were performed at the end of the procedure. Multiplanar reconstructions obtained with ACT showed extensive calcification in the carotid wall that compressed the segment of the stent that was not fully deployed. Axial views more clearly revealed the extent of calcification in the circumference of the arterial wall. Morphologic features of the plaque were not identifiable on DSA or digital radiography (nonsubtracted DSA images). This extensive wall calcification explained why the stent could not be fully deployed over its entire length (Fig 1).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Stent placement in an extracranial carotid stenosis.

A, 85% stenosis of the ICA.

B, 6–8 × 40-mm stent (Acculink; Guidant Corporation) is placed.

C, Native image immediately after stenting shows a significant residual stenosis (arrow) requiring postdilation.

D, Satisfactory result and remaining minor narrowing (arrow).

E andF MPRs, Lateral (E) and coronal (F) ACT views (5-mm sections) provide superior visualization of the entire stent, its struts, and the remaining narrowing (arrow) and show the underlying, heavily calcified plaque (arrowheads) responsible for incomplete stent deployment.

G andH, Reducing the section thickness to 0.1 mm allows visualization along a cut plane through the center of the stent, showing the effective remaining narrowing (arrow).

I andJ, On axial views, the different diameters of the recanalized lumen distal to and at the level of the plaque are appreciated. They further reveal the circumferential narrowing by the calcified plaque (arrowheads in J). Note visualization of soft-tissue components in the neck.

Case 2

A 52-year-old man presented with recurrent right-arm weakness, numbness, and aphasia. MR imaging of the brain showed a minimal acute infarction in the posterior basal ganglia and corona radiata on the left, with minimal associated petechial hemorrhage. Cerebral angiography showed marked stenosis (80%) of the M1 segment of the left middle cerebral artery just beyond the origin of the anterior temporal artery Transcatheter placement of a 3 × 8-mm balloon-expandable stent (Cypher; Cordis, Miami Lakes, FL) into the left M1 segment was successfully performed, with restoration of normal flow and an excellent anatomic result. ACT, 3D DSA, and digital radiography were performed at the end of the procedure. The stent could hardly be identified on DSA and was only slightly more visible on nonsubtracted views. ACT allowed for complete visualization of the stent in every plane. The axial view demonstrated full and uniform deployment of the stent over its entire length. This finding could not be determined from the DSA or digital radiographic images (Fig 2).

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Stent placement in an 80% stenosis of the intracranial middle cerebral artery.

A, High-grade stenosis (arrow) of the left M1 segment

B, Treatment with a 3 × 8-mm drug-eluting stent (Cypher; Cordis) was successful, completely reestablishing the lumen.

C andD, Nonsubtracted images permit moderate visualization of the deployed stent (arrows).

E andF, Coronal and axial MPRs allow superior visualization of the stent (arrows).

G andH, Orthogonal views (“down the barrel”) through the inner lumen of the stent at its proximal and distal ends show complete and symmetric deployment.

Case 3

A 66-year-old man presented with multiple vertebrobasilar transient ischemic attacks due to a severe stenosis of the midbasilar artery, as shown on diagnostic angiography. 3D DSA showed a difference of approximately 0.5–1 mm in the diameters of the basilar artery above and below the stenosis. A 3 × 8-mm drug-eluting balloon-expandable stent (Cypher; Cordis) was successfully deployed across the stenotic segment. A postdeployment angiogram demonstrated apparently good apposition of the stent to the arterial wall, with restoration of the internal luminal diameter and good anterograde flow. However, angiography showed significant differences in the diameters of the distal and proximal segments of the basilar artery into which the stent was anchored. Therefore, the balloon was advanced into the distal portion of the stent, where it was inflated to overexpand this segment. No evidence of dissection, platelet aggregation, or branch occlusion was observed. The patient awoke from general anesthesia, and results of his baseline neurologic examination were normal (Fig 3).

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Stent placement in a basilar artery stenosis.

A andB, 70% stenosis (arrow) of the midbasilar artery, with poststenotic dilatation.

C andD, Good result after stenting and dilatation. The stent (arrows) was postdilated to better oppose the distal portion to the larger lumen of the basilar artery.

E andF, Nonsubtracted images insufficiently show the stent (arrows). The degree of deployment over its entire length cannot be appreciated with certainty.

G–J, MPRs obtained immediately after stenting (stenting thickness, .1 mm) reveal the asymmetric deployment of the stent with a remaining waist (arrow). Orthogonal projections (I–J) demonstrate the change in caliber (arrows) and show the larger lumen stent distally (J).

Discussion

The design requirements of stents suitable for use in the intracranial circulation (eg, low profile, high flexibility, trackability, adequate radial strength) have thus far substantially limited the ability to construct devices with sufficient radiopacity for adequate angiographic visualization. This limitation, combined with the ability to only indirectly visualize the arterial wall of intracranial vessels, has made it difficult (if not impossible) to be certain regarding the exact position or full deployment of a stent and its apposition to the arterial wall. Although experience in intracranial stent placement for stent-assisted coiling of aneurysms and for atherosclerotic lesions is still limited, our personal experience and reports from the cardiology literature indicate that good visualization of the position, orientation, and degree of deployment of the stent is important in obtaining good outcomes (1). As stents are increasingly used to treat atherosclerotic disease and as novel stent-placement protocols (placement of double stents, covered stents, and stents with variable strut densities) are used to treat aneurysms, the need for their clear visualization will increase. Therefore, the radiopacity of stents is an important feature (2,3), especially with intracranial applications in which stents are small, short, and superimposed on the bony structures of the skull. Cases 2 and 3 seem to indicate that the availability of ACT in the angiographic suite considerably improves visualization of these devices.

The spatial resolution of our flat-panel detector system was about 200 μm (detector element = 154 μm). Although the struts of some intracranial stents (eg, 141 μm for Cypher; Cordis) are smaller than this, they may still be visualized on reconstructed images made from the volume acquisition. In this sense, ACT works like a magnifying glass, depicting structures that are smaller than the technical spatial resolution of the detector system used for the acquisition.

Duplex sonography and CT angiography play an important role in the preoperative and postoperative assessment of stented or operated extracranial carotid stenosis (4,5). Duplex sonography has been proven useful (6) for the preoperative characterization of plaque morphology; however, it is relatively operator-dependent. For follow-up of intracranial stenoses, CT angiography can be used to assess vascular patency after stents are placed in small vessels, such intracranial arteries (7). However, in vitro studies have demonstrated that the degree of in-stent stenosis tends to be overestimated (8). For immediate postprocedural CT angiography, the patient must be transported. However, mobilization and transportation to a CT scanner can cause a substantial loss of time and compromise monitoring and care of the patient during the transfer. Rapidly performing ACT while the patient remains on the angiographic table may be a feasible option.

As shown in case 1, ACT may also be used for some degree of tissue characterization before stent placement, as well as for immediate procedural monitoring and poststenting control. It may offer valuable, detailed information while a patient is still on the angiographic table, and thus, it may aid in clinical decision making.

References

  1. ↵
    Honda Y, Fitzgerald PJ.Stent thrombosis: an issue revisited in a changing world. Circulation 2003;108:2–5
    FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Fischell TA.Visible stents: all that glitters. Is it gold? J Invasive Cardiol 2000;12:233–235
    PubMed
  3. ↵
    Wiskirchen J, Kraemer K, Konig C, et al.Radiopacity of current endovascular stents: evaluation in a multiple reader phantom study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004;15:843–852
    PubMed
  4. ↵
    Prokop M, Waaijer A, Kreuzer S.CT angiography of the carotid arteries. JBR BTR 2004;87:23–29
  5. ↵
    Schuknecht B.Latest techniques in head and neck CT angiography. Neuroradiology 2004;46:s208–213
  6. ↵
    AbuRahma AF, Covelli MA, Robinson PA, Holt SM.The role of carotid duplex ultrasound in evaluating plaque morphology: potential use in selecting patients for carotid stenting. J Endovasc Surg 1999;6:59–65
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Hahnel S, Trossbach M, Braun C, et al.Small-vessel stents for intracranial angioplasty: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes by using CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1512–1516
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Trossbach M, Hartmann M, Braun C, Sartor K, Hahnel S. Small vessel stents for intracranial angioplasty: in vitro evaluation of in-stent stenoses using CT angiography. Neuroradiology 2004;46:459–463
    PubMed
  • Received February 28, 2005.
  • Accepted after revision March 10, 2005.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 26 (7)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 26, Issue 7
1 Aug 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Angiographic CT in Cerebrovascular Stenting
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Götz Benndorf, Charles M. Strother, Benjamin Claus, Ramin Naeini, Hesham Morsi, Richard Klucznik, Michael E. Mawad
Angiographic CT in Cerebrovascular Stenting
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2005, 26 (7) 1813-1818;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Angiographic CT in Cerebrovascular Stenting
Götz Benndorf, Charles M. Strother, Benjamin Claus, Ramin Naeini, Hesham Morsi, Richard Klucznik, Michael E. Mawad
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2005, 26 (7) 1813-1818;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Technique and Cases
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Quantitative Analysis of Conebeam CT for Delineating Stents in Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization
  • Clinical Impact of Flat Panel Volume CT Angiography in Evaluating the Accurate Intraoperative Deployment of Flow-Diverter Stents
  • Low-Dose Volume-of-Interest C-Arm CT Imaging of Intracranial Stents and Flow Diverters
  • The Added Value of Volume-of-Interest C-Arm CT Imaging during Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms
  • Intravenous C-Arm Conebeam CT Angiography following Long-Term Flow-Diverter Implantation: Technologic Evaluation and Preliminary Results
  • Adjunctive value of intra-arterial cone beam CT angiography relative to DSA in the evaluation of cranial and spinal arteriovenous fistulas
  • A prospective, multicenter pilot study investigating the utility of flat detector derived parenchymal blood volume maps to estimate cerebral blood volume in stroke patients
  • Role of C-Arm VasoCT in the Use of Endovascular WEB Flow Disruption in Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment
  • The utility of cone beam volume CT in the evaluation of thrombosed intracranial aneurysms in subarachnoid hemorrhage
  • Angiographic CT for Intraprocedural Monitoring of Complex Neuroendovascular Procedures
  • The utility of cone beam volume CT in the evaluation of thrombosed intracranial aneurysms in subarachnoid hemorrhage
  • Initial experience with a combined multidetector CT and biplane digital subtraction angiography suite with a single interactive table for the diagnosis and treatment of neurovascular disease
  • Feasibility of Cerebral Blood Volume Mapping by Flat Panel Detector CT in the Angiography Suite: First Experience in Patients with Acute Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusions
  • Contrast-Enhanced Angiographic Cone-Beam CT of Cerebrovascular Stents: Experimental Optimization and Clinical Application
  • Use of Angiographic CT Imaging in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory for Congenital Heart Disease
  • Angiographic CT after Intravenous Contrast Agent Application: A Noninvasive Follow-Up Tool after Intracranial Angioplasty and Stenting
  • Feasibility of Angiographic CT in Peri-Interventional Diagnostic Imaging: A Comparative Study with Multidetector CT
  • Color-Coded Digital Subtraction Angiography: The End of a Monochromatic Era?
  • C-Arm CT Measurement of Cerebral Blood Volume in Ischemic Stroke: An Experimental Study in Canines
  • Impact of Intra-Arterial Injection Parameters on Arterial, Capillary, and Venous Time-Concentration Curves in a Canine Model
  • C-Arm CT Measurement of Cerebral Blood Volume: An Experimental Study in Canines
  • Wall Shear Stress in Intracranial Self-Expanding Stents Studied Using Ultra-High-Resolution 3D Reconstructions
  • Large scan field, high spatial resolution flat-panel detector based volumetric CT of the whole human skull base and for maxillofacial imaging
  • Stent Conformity in Curved Vascular Models with Simulated Aneurysm Necks Using Flat-Panel CT: An In Vitro Study
  • Angiographic Computed Tomography for Imaging of Underdeployed Intracranial Stent
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • SAVE vs. Solumbra Techniques for Thrombectomy
  • Contrast-Induced Encephalopathy after NeuroIR
  • CT Perfusion&Reperfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Show more Interventional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • AJNR Awards
  • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
  • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Photon-Counting CT
  • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire