Improved Assessment of Middle Ear Recurrent Cholesteatomas Using a Fusion of Conventional CT and Non-EPI-DWI MRI

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Olszewska E,
   3. Wagner M,
   4. Bernal-Sprekelsen M, et al

   . Etiopathogenesis of cholesteatoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2004;261:6–24 doi:10.1007/s00405-003-0623-x pmid:12835944

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Kerckhoffs KG,
   3. Kommer MB,
   4. van Strien TH, et al

   . The disease recurrence rate after the canal wall up or canal wall down technique in adults. Laryngoscope 2016;126:980–87 doi:10.1002/lary.25591 pmid:26404516

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Crowson MG,
   3. Ramprasad VH,
   4. Chapurin N, et al

   . Cost analysis and outcomes of a second-look tympanoplasty-mastoidectomy strategy for cholesteatoma. Laryngoscope 2016;126:2574–79 doi:10.1002/lary.25941 pmid:26928951

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Vanden Abeele D,
   3. Coen E,
   4. Parizel PM, et al

   . Can MRI replace a second look operation in cholesteatoma surgery? Acta Otolaryngol 1999;119:555–61 doi:10.1080/00016489950180784 pmid:10478595

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Bennett M,
   3. Wanna G,
   4. Francis D, et al

   . Clinical and cost utility of an intraoperative endoscopic second look in cholesteatoma surgery. Laryngoscope 2018;128:2867–71 doi:10.1002/lary.27258 pmid:30325024

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Abdul-Aziz D,
   3. Kozin ED,
   4. Lin BM, et al

   . Temporal bone computed tomography findings associated with feasibility of endoscopic ear surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 2017;38:698–703 doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2017.06.007 pmid:28711236

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Muzaffar J,
   3. Metcalfe C,
   4. Colley S, et al

   . Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for residual and recurrent cholesteatoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Otolaryngol 2017;42:536–43 doi:10.1111/coa.12762 pmid:27701821

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. De Foer B,
   3. Vercruysse JP,
   4. Bernaerts A, et al

   . Middle ear cholesteatoma: non–echo-planar diffusion-weighted MR imaging versus delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging—value in detection. Radiology 2010;255:866–72 doi:10.1148/radiol.10091140 pmid:20501723

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Baráth K,
   3. Huber AM,
   4. Stämpfli P, et al

   . Neuroradiology of cholesteatomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:221–29 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2052 pmid:20360335

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Yamashita K,
    3. Hiwatashi A,
    4. Togao O, et al

    . High-resolution three-dimensional diffusion-weighted MRI/CT image data fusion for cholesteatoma surgical planning: a feasibility study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015;272:3821–24 doi:10.1007/s00405-014-3467-7 pmid:25543305

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Hanna GG,
    3. Hounsell AR,
    4. O'Sullivan JM

    . Geometrical analysis of radiotherapy target volume delineation: a systematic review of reported comparison methods. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2010;22:515–25 doi:10.1016/j.clon.2010.05.006 pmid:20554168

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. DeLong ER,
    3. DeLong DM,
    4. Clarke-Pearson DL

    . Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44:837–45 doi:10.2307/2531595 pmid:3203132

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Fluss R,
    3. Faraggi D,
    4. Reiser B

    . Estimation of the Youden Index and its associated cutoff point. Biom J 2005;47:458–72 doi:10.1002/bimj.200410135 pmid:16161804

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Donner A,
    3. Koval JJ

    . The estimation of intraclass correlation in the analysis of family data. Biometrics 1980;36:19–25 pmid:7370372

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Landis JR,
    3. Koch GG

    . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74 doi:10.2307/2529310 pmid:843571

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Varoquaux A,
    3. Rager O,
    4. Lovblad K-O, et al

    . Functional imaging of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with diffusion-weighted MRI and FDG PET/CT: quantitative analysis of ADC and SUV. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2013;40:842–52 doi:10.1007/s00259-013-2351-9 pmid:23436068

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Locketz GD,
    3. Li PM,
    4. Fischbein NJ, et al

    . Fusion of computed tomography and PROPELLER diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the detection and localization of middle ear cholesteatoma. JAMA Otolaryngol Neck Surg 2016;142:947–53 doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2016.1663 pmid:27414044

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Campos A,
    3. Mata F,
    4. Reboll R, et al

    . Computed tomography and magnetic resonance fusion imaging in cholesteatoma preoperative assessment. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017;274:1405–11 doi:10.1007/s00405-016-4415-5 pmid:27921171

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Plouin-Gaudon I,
    3. Bossard D,
    4. Ayari-Khalfallah S, et al

    . Fusion of MRIs and CT scans for surgical treatment of cholesteatoma of the middle ear in children. Arch Otolaryngol Neck Surg 2010;136:878–83 doi:10.1001/archoto.2010.151 pmid:20855680

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Desmots F,
    3. Fakhry N,
    4. Mancini J, et al

    . Shear wave elastography in head and neck lymph node assessment: image quality and diagnostic impact compared with B-mode and Doppler ultrasonography. Ultrasound Med Biol 2016;42:387–98 doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.10.019 pmid:26617244

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Rosenkrantz AB,
    3. Kim S,
    4. Lim RP, et al

    . Prostate cancer localization using multiparametric MR imaging: comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and Likert scales. Radiology 2013;269:482–92 doi:10.1148/radiol.13122233 pmid:23788719

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Migirov L,
    3. Greenberg G,
    4. Eyal A, et al

    . Imaging prior to endoscopic ear surgery: clinical note. Isr Med Assoc J 2014;16:191–93 pmid:24761713

    PubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Thiriat S,
    3. Riehm S,
    4. Kremer S, et al

    . Apparent diffusion coefficient values of middle ear cholesteatoma differ from abscess and cholesteatoma admixed infection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1123–26 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1473 pmid:19246529

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Dubrulle F,
    3. Souillard R,
    4. Chechin D, et al

    . Diffusion-weighted MR imaging sequence in the detection of postoperative recurrent cholesteatoma. Radiology 2006;238:604–10 doi:10.1148/radiol.2381041649 pmid:16304085

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Lichy MP,
    3. Wietek BM,
    4. Mugler JP, et al

    . Magnetic resonance imaging of the body trunk using a single-slab, 3-dimensional, T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo sequence with high sampling efficiency (SPACE) for high spatial resolution imaging: initial clinical experiences. Invest Radiol 2005;40:754–60 doi:10.1097/01.rli.0000185880.92346.9e pmid:16304477

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Casselman JW,
    3. Gieraerts K,
    4. Volders D, et al

    . Cone beam CT: non-dental applications. JBR-BTR 2013;96:333–53 pmid:24617175

    PubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Bernardeschi D,
    3. Lahlou G,
    4. De Seta D, et al

    . 3D endoscopic ear surgery: a clinical pilot study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2018;275:379–84 doi:10.1007/s00405-017-4839-6 pmid:29209853

    CrossRefPubMed