Bidirectional Changes in Anisotropy Are Associated with Outcomes in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Ruff R

   . Two decades of advances in understanding of mild traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2005;20:5–18 doi:10.1097/00001199-200511000-00009 pmid:15668567

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Bigler ED

   . Neuropsychological results and neuropathological findings at autopsy in a case of mild traumatic brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2004;10:794–806 pmid:15327725

   PubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Johnson VE,
   3. Stewart W,
   4. Smith DH

   . Axonal pathology in traumatic brain injury. Exp Neurol 2013;246:35–43 doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.01.013 pmid:22285252

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Mac Donald C,
   3. Dikranian K,
   4. Song S, et al

   . Detection of traumatic axonal injury with diffusion tensor imaging in a mouse model of traumatic brain injury. Exp Neurol 2007;205:116–31 doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2007.01.035 pmid:17368446

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Shenton M,
   3. Hamoda H,
   4. Schneiderman J, et al

   . A review of magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion tensor imaging findings in mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Imaging Behav 2012;6:137–92 doi:10.1007/s11682-012-9156-5 pmid:22438191

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Bazarian JJ,
   3. Zhong J,
   4. Blyth B, et al

   . Diffusion tensor imaging detects clinically important axonal damage after mild traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. J Neurotrauma 2007;24:1447–59 doi:10.1089/neu.2007.0241 pmid:17892407

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Niogi S,
   3. Mukherjee P,
   4. Ghajar J, et al

   . Extent of microstructural white matter injury in postconcussive syndrome correlates with impaired cognitive reaction time: a 3T diffusion tensor imaging study of mild traumatic brain injury. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:967–73 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0970 pmid:18272556

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Lipton ML,
   3. Gulko E,
   4. Zimmerman ME, et al

   . Diffusion-tensor imaging implicates prefrontal axonal injury in executive function impairment following very mild traumatic brain injury. Radiology 2009;252:816–24 doi:10.1148/radiol.2523081584 pmid:19567646

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Mayer A,
   3. Ling J,
   4. Mannell M, et al

   . A prospective diffusion tensor imaging study in mild traumatic brain injury. Neurology 2010;74:643–50 doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181d0ccdd pmid:20089939

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Smits M,
    3. Houston GC,
    4. Dippel DW, et al

    . Microstructural brain injury in post-concussion syndrome after minor head injury. Neuroradiology 2011;53:553–63 doi:10.1007/s00234-010-0774-6 pmid:20924757

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Alhilali LM,
    3. Yaeger K,
    4. Collins M, et al

    . Detection of central white matter injury underlying vestibulopathy after mild traumatic brain injury. Radiology 2014;272:224–32 doi:10.1148/radiol.14132670 pmid:24735411

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Grossman EJ,
    3. Ge Y,
    4. Jensen JH, et al

    . Thalamus and cognitive impairment in mild traumatic brain injury: a diffusional kurtosis imaging study. J Neurotrauma 2012;29:2318–27 doi:10.1089/neu.2011.1763 pmid:21639753

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Levin HS,
    3. Wilde E,
    4. Troyanskaya M, et al

    . Diffusion tensor imaging of mild to moderate blast-related traumatic brain injury and its sequelae. J Neurotrauma 2010;27:683–94 doi:10.1089/neu.2009.1073 pmid:20088647

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Sbordone RJ

    . The hazards of strict reliance on neuropsychological tests. Appl Neuropsychol Adult 2014;21:98–107 doi:10.1080/09084282.2012.762630 pmid:24826503

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Wilde E,
    3. McCauley S,
    4. Hunter J, et al

    . Diffusion tensor imaging of acute mild traumatic brain injury in adolescents. Neurology 2008;70:948–55 doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000305961.68029.54 pmid:18347317

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Lipton ML,
    3. Kim N,
    4. Park YK, et al

    . Robust detection of traumatic axonal injury in individual mild traumatic brain injury patients: intersubject variation, change over time and bidirectional changes in anisotropy. Brain Imaging Behav 2012;6:329–42 doi:10.1007/s11682-012-9175-2 pmid:22684769

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Kim N,
    3. Branch CA,
    4. Kim M, et al

    . Whole brain approaches for identification of microstructural abnormalities in individual patients: comparison of techniques applied to mild traumatic brain injury. PLoS One 2013;8:e59382 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059382 pmid:23555665

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Williams LM,
    3. Simms E,
    4. Clark CR, et al

    . The test-retest reliability of a standardized neurocognitive and neurophysiological test battery:“neuromarker.” Int J Neurosci 2005;115:1605–30 doi:10.1080/00207450590958475 pmid:16287629

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Yuspeh RL,
    3. Vanderploeg RD

    . Spot-the-Word: a measure for estimating premorbid intellectual functioning. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2000;15:319–26 doi:10.1093/arclin/15.4.319 pmid:14590228

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. King N,
    3. Crawford S,
    4. Wenden F, et al

    . The Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire: a measure of symptoms commonly experienced after head injury and its reliability. J Neurol 1995;242:587–92 doi:10.1007/BF00868811 pmid:8551320

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Bergner M,
    3. Bobbitt RA,
    4. Pollard WE, et al

    . The Sickness Impact Profile: validation of a health status measure. Med Care 1976;14:57–67 pmid:950811

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Potter S,
    3. Leigh E,
    4. Wade D, et al

    . The Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire: a confirmatory factor analysis. J Neurol 2006;253:1603–14 doi:10.1007/s00415-006-0275-z pmid:17063314

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. Bergner M,
    3. Bobbitt RA,
    4. Carter WB, et al

    . The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care 1981;19:787–805 pmid:7278416

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Smith SM,
    3. Johansen-Berg H,
    4. Jenkinson M, et al

    . Acquisition and voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data with tract-based spatial statistics. Nat Protoc 2007;2:499–503 doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.45 pmid:17406613

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Holmes CJ,
    3. Hoge R,
    4. Collins L, et al

    . Enhancement of MR images using registration for signal averaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998;22:324–33 doi:10.1097/00004728-199803000-00032 pmid:9530404

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Ardekani BA,
    3. Guckemus S,
    4. Bachman A, et al

    . Quantitative comparison of algorithms for inter-subject registration of 3D volumetric brain MRI scans. J Neurosci Methods 2005;142:67–76 doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.07.014 pmid:15652618

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Smith SM,
    3. Jenkinson M,
    4. Woolrich MW, et al

    . Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 2004;23:S208–19 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051 pmid:15501092

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    2. Oishi K,
    3. Zilles K,
    4. Amunts K, et al

    . Human brain white matter atlas: identification and assignment of common anatomical structures in superficial white matter. Neuroimage 2008;43:447–57 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.07.009 pmid:18692144

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    2. Mac Donald CL,
    3. Johnson AM,
    4. Cooper D, et al

    . Detection of blast-related traumatic brain injury in U.S. military personnel. N Engl J Med 2011;364:2091–100 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1008069 pmid:21631321

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    2. Benjamini Y,
    3. Hochberg Y

    . Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 1995:289–289
31. 31.↵
    2. Genovese CR,
    3. Lazar NA,
    4. Nichols T

    . Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Neuroimage 2002;15:870–78 doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.1037 pmid:11906227

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    2. Sterr A,
    3. Herron KA,
    4. Hayward C, et al

    . Are mild head injuries as mild as we think? Neurobehavioral concomitants of chronic post-concussion syndrome. BMC Neurol 2006;6:7 doi:10.1186/1471-2377-6-7 pmid:16460567

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Mayer AR,
    3. Bedrick EJ,
    4. Ling JM, et al

    . Methods for identifying subject-specific abnormalities in neuroimaging data. Hum Brain Map 2014;35:5457–70 doi:10.1002/hbm.22563 pmid:24931496

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Bouix S,
    3. Pasternak O,
    4. Rathi Y, et al

    . Increased gray matter diffusion anisotropy in patients with persistent post-concussive symptoms following mild traumatic brain injury. PLoS One 2013;8:e66205 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066205 pmid:23776631

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Bonhoeffer T,
    3. Yuste R

    . Spine motility: phenomenology, mechanisms, and function. Neuron 2002;35:1019–27 doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00906-6 pmid:12354393

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 36.↵
    2. Scholz J,
    3. Klein MC,
    4. Behrens TE, et al

    . Training induces changes in white-matter architecture. Nat Neurosci 2009;12:1370–71 doi:10.1038/nn.2412 pmid:19820707

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
37. 37.↵
    2. Filley CM

    . White matter: beyond focal disconnection. Neurol Clin 2011;29:81–97, viii doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2010.10.003 pmid:21172572

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    2. Filley CM

    . White matter: organization and functional relevance. Neuropsychol Rev 2010;20:158–73 doi:10.1007/s11065-010-9127-9 pmid:20352350

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    2. Foster J,
    3. Eskes G,
    4. Stuss D

    . The cognitive neuropsychology of attention: a frontal lobe perspective. Cogitive Neuropsychology 1994;11:133–47 doi:10.1080/02643299408251971

    CrossRef
40. 40.↵
    2. Olton DS,
    3. Wenk GL,
    4. Church RM, et al

    . Attention and the frontal cortex as examined by simultaneous temporal processing. Neuropsychologia 1988;26:307–18 doi:10.1016/0028-3932(88)90083-8 pmid:3399046

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
41. 41.↵
    2. Nagahama Y,
    3. Okada T,
    4. Katsumi Y, et al

    . Dissociable mechanisms of attentional control within the human prefrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex 2001;11:85–92 doi:10.1093/cercor/11.1.85 pmid:11113037

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
42. 42.↵
    2. Bocquillon P,
    3. Dujardin K,
    4. Betrouni N, et al

    . Attention impairment in temporal lobe epilepsy: a neurophysiological approach via analysis of the P300 wave. Hum Brain Mapp 2009;30:2267–77 doi:10.1002/hbm.20666 pmid:19034898

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
43. 43.↵
    2. Grossman EJ,
    3. Jensen JH,
    4. Babb JS, et al

    . Cognitive impairment in mild traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal diffusional kurtosis and perfusion imaging study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:951–57, S1–3 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3358 pmid:23179649

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
44. 44.↵
    2. Grossman EJ,
    3. Inglese M

    . The role of thalamic damage in mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2016;33:163–67 doi:10.1089/neu.2015.3965 pmid:26054745

    CrossRefPubMed
45. 45.↵
    2. Mac Donald CL,
    3. Dikranian K,
    4. Bayly P, et al

    . Diffusion tensor imaging reliably detects experimental traumatic axonal injury and indicates approximate time of injury. J Neurosci 2007;27:11869–76 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3647-07.2007 pmid:17978027

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
46. 46.↵
    2. Klawiter EC,
    3. Schmidt RE,
    4. Trinkaus K, et al

    . Radial diffusivity predicts demyelination in ex vivo multiple sclerosis spinal cords. Neuroimage 2011;55:1454–60 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.007 pmid:21238597

    CrossRefPubMed
47. 47.↵
    2. Song SK,
    3. Sun SW,
    4. Ju WK, et al

    . Diffusion tensor imaging detects and differentiates axon and myelin degeneration in mouse optic nerve after retinal ischemia. Neuroimage 2003;20:1714–22 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.07.005 pmid:14642481

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
48. 48.↵
    2. Oouchi H,
    3. Yamada K,
    4. Sakai K, et al

    . Diffusion anisotropy measurement of brain white matter is affected by voxel size: underestimation occurs in areas with crossing fibers. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1102–06 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0488 pmid:17569968

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
49. 49.↵
    2. Paniak C,
    3. Toller-Lobe G,
    4. Reynolds S, et al

    . A randomized trial of two treatments for mild traumatic brain injury: 1 year follow-up. Brain Injury 2000;14:219–26 doi:10.1080/026990500120691 pmid:10759039

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
50. 50.↵
    2. Emanuelson I,
    3. Andersson Holmkvist E,
    4. Björklund R, et al

    . Quality of life and post-concussion symptoms in adults after mild traumatic brain injury: a population-based study in western Sweden. Acta Neurol Scand 2003;108:332–38 doi:10.1034/j.1600-0404.2003.00155.x pmid:14616303

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
51. 51.↵
    2. Corrigan JD,
    3. Harrison-Felix C,
    4. Bogner J, et al

    . Systematic bias in traumatic brain injury outcome studies because of loss to follow-up. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:153–60 doi:10.1053/apmr.2003.50093 pmid:12601644

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
52. 52.↵
    2. Smith-Seemiller L,
    3. Fow NR,
    4. Kant R, et al

    . Presence of post-concussion syndrome symptoms in patients with chronic pain vs mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2003;17:199–206 doi:10.1080/0269905021000030823 pmid:12623496

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
53. 53.↵
    2. Chan RC

    . Base rate of post-concussion symptoms among normal people and its neuropsychological correlates. Clin Rehabil 2001;15:266–73 doi:10.1191/026921501675253420 pmid:11386396

    Abstract/FREE Full Text