Evaluation for Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury: Review of the Literature and a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Franz RW,
   3. Willette PA,
   4. Wood MJ, et al

   . A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic screening criteria for blunt cerebrovascular injuries. J Am Coll Surg 2012;214:313–27 doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.11.012 pmid:22244206

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Bromberg WJ,
   3. Collier BC,
   4. Diebel LN, et al

   . Blunt cerebrovascular injury practice management guidelines: the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma 2010;68:471–77 pmid:20154559

   PubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Biffl WL,
   3. Moore EE,
   4. Elliott JP, et al

   . The devastating potential of blunt vertebral arterial injuries. Ann Surg 2000;231:672–81 doi:10.1097/00000658-200005000-00007 pmid:10767788

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Miller PR,
   3. Fabian TC,
   4. Croce MA, et al

   . Prospective screening for blunt cerebrovascular injuries: analysis of diagnostic modalities and outcomes. Ann Surg 2002;236:386–93; discussion 393–95 doi:10.1097/00000658-200209000-00015 pmid:12192325

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Edwards NM,
   3. Fabian TC,
   4. Claridge JA, et al

   . Antithrombotic therapy and endovascular stents are effective treatment for blunt carotid injuries: results from longterm followup. J Am Coll Surg 2007;204:1007–13; discussion 1014–15 doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.12.041 pmid:17481530

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Stein DM,
   3. Boswell S,
   4. Sliker CW, et al

   . Blunt cerebrovascular injuries: does treatment always matter? J Trauma 2009;66:132–43; discussion 143–44 doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e318142d146 pmid:19131816

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Bruns BR,
   3. Tesoriero R,
   4. Kufera J, et al

   . Blunt cerebrovascular injury screening guidelines: what are we willing to miss? J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2014;76:691–95 doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3182ab1b4d pmid:24553535

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Beliaev AM,
   3. Barber PA,
   4. Marshall RJ, et al

   . Denver screening protocol for blunt cerebrovascular injury reduces the use of multi-detector computed tomography angiography. ANZ J Surg 2014;84:429–32 doi:10.1111/ans.12439 pmid:24224749

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Goodwin RB,
   3. Beery PR 2nd.,
   4. Dorbish RJ, et al

   . Computed tomographic angiography versus conventional angiography for the diagnosis of blunt cerebrovascular injury in trauma patients. J Trauma 2009;67:1046–50 doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181b83b63 pmid:19901666

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Roberts DJ,
    3. Chaubey VP,
    4. Zygun DA, et al

    . Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomographic angiography for blunt cerebrovascular injury detection in trauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2013;257:621–32 doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318288c514 pmid:23470509

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Paulus EM,
    3. Fabian TC,
    4. Savage SA, et al

    . Blunt cerebrovascular injury screening with 64-channel multidetector computed tomography: more slices finally cut it. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2014;76:279–83; discussion 284–75 doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000000101 pmid:24458034

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Harrigan MR,
    3. Weinberg JA,
    4. Peaks YS, et al

    . Management of blunt extracranial traumatic cerebrovascular injury: a multidisciplinary survey of current practice. World J Emerg Surg 2011;6:11 doi:10.1186/1749-7922-6-11 pmid:21477304

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Hendee W

    . Risk of medical imaging. Med Phys 2013;40:040401 doi:10.1118/1.4794923 pmid:23556866

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Sabarudin A,
    3. Yusof MZ,
    4. Mohamad M, et al

    . Radiation dose associated with cerebral CT angiography and CT perfusion: an experimental phantom study. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2014;162:316–21 doi:10.1093/rpd/nct280 pmid:24255172

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Han A,
    3. Yoon DY,
    4. Kim ES, et al

    . Value of CT angiography for the detection of intracranial vascular lesions in patients with acute severe headache. Eur Radiol 2013;23:1443–49 doi:10.1007/s00330-012-2751-4 pmid:23263605

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Weinstein MC,
    3. Siegel JE,
    4. Gold MR, et al

    . Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA 1996;276:1253–58 doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540150055031 pmid:8849754

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Tan-Torres Edejer T,
    2. Baltusen R,
    3. Adam T, et al.

    , eds. Making Choices in Health: WHO Guide to Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003
18. 18.↵
    2. Kopelman TR,
    3. Leeds S,
    4. Berardoni NE, et al

    . Incidence of blunt cerebrovascular injury in low-risk cervical spine fractures. Am J Surg 2011;202:684–88; discussion 688–89 doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.06.033 pmid:22137135

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    US Census Bureau. Expectation of Life at Birth, and Projections. 2008. http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0104.pdf. Accessed November 26, 2014.
20. 20.↵
    2. Cothren CC,
    3. Moore EE,
    4. Ray CE Jr., et al

    . Screening for blunt cerebrovascular injuries is cost-effective. Am J Surg 2005;190:845–49 pmid:16307932

    PubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Kaye D,
    3. Brasel KJ,
    4. Neideen T, et al

    . Screening for blunt cerebrovascular injuries is cost-effective. J Trauma 2011;70:1051–56; discussion 1056–57 doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e318211857d pmid:21610423

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Hannon N,
    3. Daly L,
    4. Murphy S, et al

    . Acute hospital, community, and indirect costs of stroke associated with atrial fibrillation: population-based study. Stroke 2014;45:3670–74 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005960 pmid:25358697

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Fabian TC,
    3. Patton JH Jr.,
    4. Croce MA, et al

    . Blunt carotid injury. Importance of early diagnosis and anticoagulant therapy. Ann Surg 1996;223:513–22; discussion 522–25 doi:10.1097/00000658-199605000-00007 pmid:8651742

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Emmett KP,
    3. Fabian TC,
    4. DiCocco JM, et al

    . Improving the screening criteria for blunt cerebrovascular injury: the appropriate role for computed tomography angiography. J Trauma 2011;70:1058–63; discussion 1063–65 doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e318213f849 pmid:21610424

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Eastman AL,
    3. Muraliraj V,
    4. Sperry JL, et al

    . CTA-based screening reduces time to diagnosis and stroke rate in blunt cervical vascular injury. J Trauma 2009;67:551–56; discussion 555–56 doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181b84408 pmid:19741399

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Schneidereit NP,
    3. Simons R,
    4. Nicolaou S, et al

    . Utility of screening for blunt vascular neck injuries with computed tomographic angiography. J Trauma 2006;60:209–15; discussion 215–16 doi:10.1097/01.ta.0000195651.60080.2c pmid:16456458

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Berne JD,
    3. Cook A,
    4. Rowe SA, et al

    . A multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors for blunt cerebrovascular injury. J Vasc Surg 2010;51:57–64 doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2009.08.071 pmid:19954917

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    2. Utter GH,
    3. Hollingworth W,
    4. Hallam DK, et al

    . Sixteen-slice CT angiography in patients with suspected blunt carotid and vertebral artery injuries. J Am Coll Surg 2006;203:838–48 doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.08.003 pmid:17116552

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    2. Malhotra AK,
    3. Camacho M,
    4. Ivatury RR, et al

    . Computed tomographic angiography for the diagnosis of blunt carotid/vertebral artery injury: a note of caution. Ann Surg 2007;246:632–42; discussion 642–43 doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181568cab pmid:17893500

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    2. DiCocco JM,
    3. Emmett KP,
    4. Fabian TC, et al

    . Blunt cerebrovascular injury screening with 32-channel multidetector computed tomography: more slices still don't cut it. Ann Surg 2011;253:444–50 doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31820d946b pmid:21263309

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Parks NA,
    3. Croce MA

    . Use of computed tomography in the emergency room to evaluate blunt cerebrovascular injury. Adv Surg 2012;46:205–17 doi:10.1016/j.yasu.2012.03.003 pmid:22873041

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Cothren CC,
    3. Moore EE,
    4. Biffl WL, et al

    . Anticoagulation is the gold standard therapy for blunt carotid injuries to reduce stroke rate. Arch Surg 2004;139:540–45; discussion 545–56 doi:10.1001/archsurg.139.5.540 pmid:15136355

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    2. Wahl WL,
    3. Brandt MM,
    4. Thompson BG, et al

    . Antiplatelet therapy: an alternative to heparin for blunt carotid injury. J Trauma 2002;52:896–901 doi:10.1097/00005373-200205000-00012 pmid:11988655

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.
    2. Cothren CC,
    3. Biffl WL,
    4. Moore EE, et al

    . Treatment for blunt cerebrovascular injuries: equivalence of anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents. Arch Surg 2009;144:685–90 doi:10.1001/archsurg.2009.111 pmid:19620551

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science