Computational Identification of Tumor Anatomic Location Associated with Survival in 2 Large Cohorts of Human Primary Glioblastomas

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Wen PY,
   3. Kesari S

   . Malignant gliomas in adults. N Engl J Med 2008;359:492–507 doi:10.1056/NEJMra0708126 pmid:18669428

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Larjavaara S,
   3. Mäntylä R,
   4. Salminen T, et al

   . Incidence of gliomas by anatomic location. Neuro Oncol 2007;9:319–25 doi:10.1215/15228517-2007-016 pmid:17522333

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Dunn GP,
   3. Rinne ML,
   4. Wykosky J, et al

   . Emerging insights into the molecular and cellular basis of glioblastoma. Genes Dev 2012;26:756–84 doi:10.1101/gad.187922.112 pmid:22508724

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Verhaak RG,
   3. Hoadley KA,
   4. Purdom E, et al

   ; Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1. Cancer Cell 2010;17:98–110 doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.020 pmid:20129251

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Brennan CW,
   3. Verhaak RG,
   4. McKenna A, et al

   . The somatic genomic landscape of glioblastoma. Cell 2013;155:462–77 doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.034 pmid:24120142

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Yan H,
   3. Parsons DW,
   4. Jin G, et al

   . IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. N Engl J Med 2009;360:765–73 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0808710 pmid:19228619

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Lim DA,
   3. Cha S,
   4. Mayo MC, et al

   . Relationship of glioblastoma multiforme to neural stem cell regions predicts invasive and multifocal tumor phenotype. Neuro Oncol 2007;9:424–29 doi:10.1215/15228517-2007-023 pmid:17622647

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Colen RR,
   3. Vangel M,
   4. Wang J, et al

   ; TCGA Glioma Phenotype Research Group. Imaging genomic mapping of an invasive MRI phenotype predicts patient outcome and metabolic dysfunction: a TCGA glioma phenotype research group project. BMC Med Genomics 2014;7:30 doi:10.1186/1755-8794-7-30 pmid:24889866

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Ellingson BM,
   3. Lai A,
   4. Harris RJ, et al

   . Probabilistic radiographic atlas of glioblastoma phenotypes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:533–40 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3253 pmid:22997168

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Gutman DA,
    3. Cooper LA,
    4. Hwang SN, et al

    . MR imaging predictors of molecular profile and survival: multi-institutional study of the TCGA glioblastoma data set. Radiology 2013;267:560–69 doi:10.1148/radiol.13120118 pmid:23392431

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Clark K,
    3. Vendt B,
    4. Smith K, et al

    . The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): maintaining and operating a public information repository. J Digit Imaging 2013;26:1045–57 doi:10.1007/s10278-013-9622-7 pmid:23884657

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Rosset A,
    3. Spadola L,
    4. Ratib O

    . OsiriX: an open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images. J Digit Imaging 2004;17:205–16 doi:10.1007/s10278-004-1014-6 pmid:15534753

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Johnson H,
    3. Harris G,
    4. Williams K

    . BRAINSFit: mutual information registrations of whole-brain 3D images, using the Insight Toolkit. Insight Journal 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/1926/1291. Accessed December 15, 2015.
14. 14.↵
    2. Fedorov A,
    3. Beichel R,
    4. Kalpathy-Cramer J, et al

    . 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012;30:1323–41 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 pmid:22770690

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Smith SM,
    3. Nichols TE

    . Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference. Neuroimage 2009;44:83–98 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.061 pmid:18501637

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Tusher VG,
    3. Tibshirani R,
    4. Chu G

    . Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98:5116–21 doi:10.1073/pnas.091062498 pmid:11309499

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Subramanian A,
    3. Tamayo P,
    4. Mootha VK, et al

    . Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102:15545–50 doi:10.1073/pnas.0506580102 pmid:16199517

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Kanehisa M,
    3. Goto S

    . KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:27–30 doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.27 pmid:10592173

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Jörnsten R,
    3. Abenius T,
    4. Kling T, et al

    . Network modeling of the transcriptional effects of copy number aberrations in glioblastoma. Mol Syst Boil 2011;7:486 doi:10.1038/msb.2011.17 pmid:21525872

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Jackson EL,
    3. Garcia-Verdugo JM,
    4. Gil-Perotin S, et al

    . PDGFR alpha-positive B cells are neural stem cells in the adult SVZ that form glioma-like growths in response to increased PDGF signaling. Neuron 2006;51:187–99 doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.06.012 pmid:16846854

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Puputti M,
    3. Tynninen O,
    4. Sihto H, et al

    . Amplification of KIT, PDGFRA, VEGFR2, and EGFR in gliomas. Mol Cancer Res 2006;4:927–34 doi:10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-06-0085 pmid:17189383

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Méndez-Gómez HR,
    3. Vicario-Abejón C

    . The homeobox gene Gsx2 regulates the self-renewal and differentiation of neural stem cells and the cell fate of postnatal progenitors. PLoS One 2012;7:e29799 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029799 pmid:22242181

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Blom T,
    3. Roselli A,
    4. Tanner M, et al

    . Mutation and copy number analysis of LNX1 and Numbl in nervous system tumors. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2008;186:103–09 doi:10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2008.07.003 pmid:18940473

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Krex D,
    3. Klink B,
    4. Hartmann C, et al

    ; German Glioma Network. Long-term survival with glioblastoma multiforme. Brain 2007;130(pt 10):2596–606 doi:10.1093/brain/awm204 pmid:17785346

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. Kim SS,
    3. McCutcheon IE,
    4. Suki D, et al

    . Awake craniotomy for brain tumors near eloquent cortex: correlation of intraoperative cortical mapping with neurological outcomes in 309 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery 2009;64:836–45; discussion 345–46 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000342405.80881.81 pmid:19404147

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Sanai N,
    3. Berger MS

    . Glioma extent of resection and its impact on patient outcome. Neurosurgery 2008;62:753–64; discussion 264–66 doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000318159.21731.cf pmid:18496181

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Heddleston JM,
    3. Li Z,
    4. McLendon RE, et al

    . The hypoxic microenvironment maintains glioblastoma stem cells and promotes reprogramming towards a cancer stem cell phenotype. Cell Cycle 2009;8:3274–84 doi:10.4161/cc.8.20.9701 pmid:19770585

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    2. Li Z,
    3. Bao S,
    4. Wu Q, et al

    . Hypoxia-inducible factors regulate tumorigenic capacity of glioma stem cells. Cancer Cell 2009;15:501–13 doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2009.03.018 pmid:19477429

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    2. Kaur B,
    3. Khwaja FW,
    4. Severson EA, et al

    . Hypoxia and the hypoxia-inducible-factor pathway in glioma growth and angiogenesis. Neuro Oncol 2005;7:134–53 doi:10.1215/S1152851704001115 pmid:15831232

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    2. Diehn M,
    3. Nardini C,
    4. Wang DS, et al

    . Identification of noninvasive imaging surrogates for brain tumor gene-expression modules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:5213–18 doi:10.1073/pnas.0801279105 pmid:18362333

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    2. Li L,
    3. Candelario KM,
    4. Thomas K, et al

    . Hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) is required for neural stem cell maintenance and vascular stability in the adult mouse SVZ. J Neurosci 2014;34:16713–19 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4590-13.2014 pmid:25505323

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    2. Snuderl M,
    3. Fazlollahi L,
    4. Le LP, et al

    . Mosaic amplification of multiple receptor tyrosine kinase genes in glioblastoma. Cancer Cell 2011;20:810–17 doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2011.11.005 pmid:22137795

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    2. Sottoriva A,
    3. Spiteri I,
    4. Piccirillo SG, et al

    . Intratumor heterogeneity in human glioblastoma reflects cancer evolutionary dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013;110:4009–14 doi:10.1073/pnas.1219747110 pmid:23412337

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. 34.↵
    2. Sturm D,
    3. Witt H,
    4. Hovestadt V, et al

    . Hotspot mutations in H3F3A and IDH1 define distinct epigenetic and biological subgroups of glioblastoma. Cancer Cell 2012;22:425–37 doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2012.08.024 pmid:23079654

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science