MR Neurography of the Lumbosacral Plexus for Lower Extremity Radiculopathy: Frequency of Findings, Characteristics of Abnormal Intraneural Signal, and Correlation with Electromyography

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Tarulli AW,
   3. Raynor EM

   . Lumbosacral radiculopathy. Neurol Clin 2007;25:387–405 doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2007.01.008 pmid:17445735

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Dillingham TR

   . Evaluating the patient with suspected radiculopathy. PM R 2013;5:S41–49 doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.03.015 pmid:23524070

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Tong HC,
   3. Haig AJ,
   4. Yamakawa KS, et al

   . Specificity of needle electromyography for lumbar radiculopathy and plexopathy in 55- to 79-year-old asymptomatic subjects. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2006;85:908–12; quiz 913–15, 934 doi:10.1097/01.phm.0000242627.81326.6c pmid:17079963

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Jensen MC,
   3. Brant-Zawadzki MN,
   4. Obuchowski N, et al

   . Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl J Med 1994;331:69–73 doi:10.1056/NEJM199407143310201 pmid:8208267

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Boden SD,
   3. McCowin PR,
   4. Davis DO, et al

   . Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects: a prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990;72:1178–84 doi:10.2106/00004623-199072080-00008 pmid:2398088

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Howe FA,
   3. Filler AG,
   4. Bell BA, et al

   . Magnetic resonance neurography. Magn Reson Med 1992;28:328–38 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910280215 pmid:1461131

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Chhabra A,
   3. Flammang A,
   4. Padua A Jr., et al

   . Magnetic resonance neurography: technical considerations. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2014;24:67–78 doi:10.1016/j.nic.2013.03.032 pmid:24210313

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Soldatos T,
   3. Andreisek G,
   4. Thawait GK, et al

   . High-resolution 3-T MR neurography of the lumbosacral plexus. Radiographics 2013;33:967–87 doi:10.1148/rg.334115761 pmid:23842967

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Lewis AM,
   3. Layzer R,
   4. Engstrom JW, et al

   . Magnetic resonance neurography in extraspinal sciatica. Arch Neurol 2006;63:1469–72 doi:10.1001/archneur.63.10.1469 pmid:17030664

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Filler AG,
    3. Haynes J,
    4. Jordan SE, et al

    . Sciatica of nondisc origin and piriformis syndrome: diagnosis by magnetic resonance neurography and interventional magnetic resonance imaging with outcome study of resulting treatment. J Neurosurg Spine 2005;2:99–115 doi:10.3171/spi.2005.2.2.0099 pmid:15739520

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Yoshida T,
    3. Sueyoshi T,
    4. Suwazono S, et al

    . Three-Tesla magnetic resonance neurography of the brachial plexus in cervical radiculopathy. Muscle Nerve 2015;52:392–96 doi:10.1002/mus.24560 pmid:25557217

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Laporte C,
    3. Albert JD,
    4. Duvauferrier R, et al

    . MRI investigation of radiating pain in the lower limbs: value of an additional sequence dedicated to the lumbosacral plexus and pelvic girdle. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;203:1280–85 doi:10.2214/AJR.13.11884 pmid:25415706

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Iversen T,
    3. Solberg TK,
    4. Romner B, et al

    . Accuracy of physical examination for chronic lumbar radiculopathy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2013;14:206 doi:10.1186/1471-2474-14-206 pmid:23837886

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Suri P,
    3. Rainville J,
    4. Katz JN, et al

    . The accuracy of the physical examination for the diagnosis of midlumbar and low lumbar nerve root impingement. Spine 2011;36:63–73 doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c953cc pmid:20543768

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Crim J,
    3. Ingalls K

    . Accuracy of MR neurography in the diagnosis of brachial plexopathy. Eur J Radiol 2017;95:24–27 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.07.012 pmid:28987674

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Chhabra A,
    3. Belzberg AJ,
    4. Rosson GD, et al

    . Impact of high resolution 3 Tesla MR neurography (MRN) on diagnostic thinking and therapeutic patient management. Eur Radiol 2016;26:1235–44 doi:10.1007/s00330-015-3958-y pmid:26396110

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Lurie JD,
    3. Tosteson AN,
    4. Tosteson TD, et al

    . Reliability of readings of magnetic resonance imaging features of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33:1605–10 doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181791af3 pmid:18552677

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Guggenberger R,
    3. Markovic D,
    4. Eppenberger P, et al

    . Assessment of median nerve with MR neurography by using diffusion-tensor imaging: normative and pathologic diffusion values. Radiology 2012;265:194–203 doi:10.1148/radiol.12111403 pmid:22820733

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Narayanaswami P,
    3. Geisbush T,
    4. Jones L, et al

    . Critically re-evaluating a common technique: accuracy, reliability, and confirmation bias of EMG. Neurology 2016;86:218–23 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000002292 pmid:26701380

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Cho SC,
    3. Ferrante MA,
    4. Levin KH, et al

    . Utility of electrodiagnostic testing in evaluating patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy: an evidence-based review. Muscle Nerve 2010;42:276–82 doi:10.1002/mus.21759 pmid:20658602

    CrossRefPubMed