Article Figures & Data
Figures
- FIG 1.
Axial MR images in a patient with a large left thalamic hemorrhage showing the effects of motion artifacts on standard GRE imaging (A) compared with non–motion-corrected (B) and motion-corrected (C) msEPI. Also note the increased conspicuity of a small parenchymal hemorrhage (arrow) in the right parietal region on msEPI compared with standard GRE. Reprinted with permission from the Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona.
- FIG 2.
Results of scoring between GRE and msEPI for a total of 137 subjects with 53 subjects having T2* lesions. Motion-corrected msEPI was superior to GRE imaging in motion artifacts (P < .001), image quality (P < .001), and lesion conspicuity (P < .001). However, GRE was superior to motion-corrected msEPI in skull base artifacts (P < .001). Reprinted with permission from the Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona.
- FIG 3.
Axial standard GRE (A) and motion-corrected msEPI (B) in a subject with a developmental venous anomaly showing improved identification of tubular lesions in motion-corrected msEPI versus standard GRE imaging. Reprinted with permission from the Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona.
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.