Reduction of Oxygen-Induced CSF Hyperintensity on FLAIR MR Images in Sedated Children: Usefulness of Magnetization-Prepared FLAIR Imaging

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Braga FT,
   3. da Rocha AJ,
   4. Hernandez Filho G, et al

   . Relationship between the concentration of supplemental oxygen and signal intensity of CSF depicted by fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1863–68 pmid:14561617

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Deliganis AV,
   3. Fisher DJ,
   4. Lam AM, et al

   . Cerebrospinal fluid signal intensity increase on FLAIR MR images in patients under general anesthesia: the role of supplemental O2. Radiology 2001;218:152–56 doi:10.1148/radiology.218.1.r01ja43152 pmid:11152794

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Filippi CG,
   3. Ulug AM,
   4. Lin D, et al

   . Hyperintense signal abnormality in subarachnoid spaces and basal cisterns on MR images of children anesthetized with propofol: new fluid-attenuated inversion recovery finding. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:394–99 pmid:11156789

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Frigon C,
   3. Shaw DW,
   4. Heckbert SR, et al

   . Supplemental oxygen causes increased signal intensity in subarachnoid cerebrospinal fluid on brain FLAIR MR images obtained in children during general anesthesia. Radiology 2004;233:51–55 doi:10.1148/radiol.2331031375 pmid:15454616

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Ozcan UA,
   3. Isik U,
   4. Ozpinar A, et al

   . Assessment of sedated pediatric brain with 3D-FLAIR sequence at 3T MRI. Brain Dev 2015;37:495–500 doi:10.1016/j.braindev.2014.08.008 pmid:25282484

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Mohamed M,
   3. Heasly DC,
   4. Yagmurlu B, et al

   . Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR imaging and subarachnoid hemorrhage: not a panacea. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:545–50 pmid:15090339

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Noguchi K,
   3. Ogawa T,
   4. Seto H, et al

   . Subacute and chronic subarachnoid hemorrhage: diagnosis with fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MR imaging. Radiology 1997;203:257–62 doi:10.1148/radiology.203.1.9122404 pmid:9122404

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Bozzao A,
   3. Bastianello S,
   4. Bozzao L

   . Superior sagittal sinus thrombosis with high-signal-intensity CSF mimicking subarachnoid hemorrhage on MR FLAIR images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:1183–84 doi:10.2214/ajr.169.4.9308487 pmid:9308487

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Dechambre SD,
   3. Duprez T,
   4. Grandin CB, et al

   . High signal in cerebrospinal fluid mimicking subarachnoid haemorrhage on FLAIR following acute stroke and intravenous contrast medium. Neuroradiology 2000;42:608–11 doi:10.1007/s002340000347 pmid:10997567

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Anzai Y,
    3. Ishikawa M,
    4. Shaw DW, et al

    . Paramagnetic effect of supplemental oxygen on CSF hyperintensity on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR images. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:274–79 pmid:14970030

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Berthezene Y,
    3. Tournut P,
    4. Turjman F, et al

    . Inhaled oxygen: a brain MR contrast agent? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995;16:2010–12 pmid:8585488

    Abstract
12. 12.↵
    2. Runge VM,
    3. Stewart RG,
    4. Clanton JA, et al

    . Work in progress: potential oral and intravenous paramagnetic NMR contrast agents. Radiology 1983;147:789–91 doi:10.1148/radiology.147.3.6844614 pmid:6844614

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Zaharchuk G,
    3. Martin AJ,
    4. Rosenthal G, et al

    . Measurement of cerebrospinal fluid oxygen partial pressure in humans using MRI. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:113–21 doi:10.1002/mrm.20546 pmid:15968660

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Busse RF,
    3. Hariharan H,
    4. Vu A, et al

    . Fast spin echo sequences with very long echo trains: design of variable refocusing flip angle schedules and generation of clinical T2 contrast. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:1030–37 doi:10.1002/mrm.20863 pmid:16598719

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Hui FK,
    4. Mugler JP 3rd.

    . Suppression of cerebrospinal fluid and blood flow artifacts in FLAIR MR imaging with a single-slab three-dimensional pulse sequence: initial experience. Radiology 2001;221:251–55 doi:10.1148/radiol.2211001712 pmid:11568348

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Kitajima M,
    3. Hirai T,
    4. Shigematsu Y, et al

    . Comparison of 3D FLAIR, 2D FLAIR, and 2D T2-weighted MR imaging of brain stem anatomy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:922–27 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2874 pmid:22268088

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Naganawa S,
    3. Koshikawa T,
    4. Nakamura T, et al

    . Comparison of flow artifacts between 2D-FLAIR and 3D-FLAIR sequences at 3 T. Eur Radiol 2004;14:1901–08 pmid:15221269

    PubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Wu HM,
    3. Yousem DM,
    4. Chung HW, et al

    . Influence of imaging parameters on high-intensity cerebrospinal fluid artifacts in fast-FLAIR MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:393–99 pmid:11901006

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Visser F,
    3. Zwanenburg JJ,
    4. Hoogduin JM, et al

    . High-resolution magnetization-prepared 3D-FLAIR imaging at 7.0 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 2010;64:194–202 doi:10.1002/mrm.22397 pmid:20572143

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Wong EC,
    3. Liu TT,
    4. Luh WM, et al

    . T(1) and T(2) selective method for improved SNR in CSF-attenuated imaging: T(2)-FLAIR. Magn Reson Med 2001;45:529–32 pmid:11241715

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Lu H,
    3. Nagae-Poetscher LM,
    4. Golay X, et al

    . Routine clinical brain MRI sequences for use at 3.0 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:13–22 doi:10.1002/jmri.20356 pmid:15971174

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Neeb H,
    3. Zilles K,
    4. Shah NJ

    . A new method for fast quantitative mapping of absolute water content in vivo. Neuroimage 2006;31:1156–68 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.063 pmid:16650780

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Smith SA,
    3. Edden RA,
    4. Farrell JA, et al

    . Measurement of T1 and T2 in the cervical spinal cord at 3 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:213–19 doi:10.1002/mrm.21596 pmid:18581383

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Stanisz GJ,
    3. Odrobina EE,
    4. Pun J, et al

    . T1, T2 relaxation and magnetization transfer in tissue at 3T. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:507–12 doi:10.1002/mrm.20605 pmid:16086319

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Hennig J,
    3. Weigel M,
    4. Scheffler K

    . Multiecho sequences with variable refocusing flip angles: optimization of signal behavior using smooth transitions between pseudo steady states (TRAPS). Magn Reson Med 2003;49:527–35 doi:10.1002/mrm.10391 pmid:12594756

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Melhem ER,
    3. Jara H,
    4. Eustace S

    . Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR imaging: identification of protein concentration thresholds for CSF hyperintensity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:859–62 doi:10.2214/ajr.169.3.9275912 pmid:9275912

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Cottrell GT,
    3. Ferguson AV

    . Sensory circumventricular organs: central roles in integrated autonomic regulation. Regul Pept 2004;117:11–23 doi:10.1016/j.regpep.2003.09.004 pmid:14687696

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    2. Vattipally VR,
    3. Bronen RA

    . MR imaging of epilepsy: strategies for successful interpretation. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2004;14:349–72 doi:10.1016/j.nic.2004.04.002 pmid:15324853

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    2. Murakami JW,
    3. Weinberger E,
    4. Shaw DW

    . Normal myelination of the pediatric brain imaged with fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1406–11 pmid:10512220

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    2. Welker KM,
    3. Patton A

    . Assessment of normal myelination with magnetic resonance imaging. Semin Neurol 2012;32:15–28 doi:10.1055/s-0032-1306382 pmid:22422203

    CrossRefPubMed